Wednesday, April 18, 2012

essay 4 rough draft


Population Growth: Does It Even Exist?
Introduction
            Population growth is not a new phenomenon. Since the day humans walked the earth, the human population has increased every year. Some areas of the world have seen a decreasing population, but that is not true of the world as a hole. Especially since the baby boomer era, which occurred just after World War II ended, even the rate at which the population is growing has grown. Our planet earth can only hold so many people sustainably, and it is blatantly obvious that we have reached that limit, otherwise known as carrying capacity. Environmentalists all over the world have contributed their two cents on the matter. One whose opinion particularly stands out is that of Derrick Jensen who described carrying capacity as the number of any given species who could live in a particular place forever without harming it.” With all of the non-renewable sources, and even the renewable sources, being depleted, it has become painfully clear that we are no longer living sustainably on this planet. This issue has been happening for years now and it is clear that there is no clear-cut way to counter this, or we would have done something about it by now. It is especially hard to find a way to counter the growth when a portion of the population doesn’t believe it is even an issue. However, the majority of the population does recognize that population growth is, in face, a real problems. Some people have even started coming up with potential solutions including educating the public and raising awareness about the matter, providing more birth control services to women, and improved family planning services across the board.
Theoretical Frame
            This essay is centered on whether or not people believe population growth is actually real or not. My theory is that most people who believe it is real are (1) more educated than those who don’t, and (2) they are taking steps (be it directly or indirectly) to at the very least retarded the rate at which the population is growing. My theory also takes into account the people who believe population growth is a myth. The people who don’t believe population growth is happening are mostly uneducated people who don’t take any steps to try to slow down population growth and, by default, contribute to the growing population. Delaying population growth would require people to go out of their way to do an extra little something or other on a regular basis, be it go out and get a prescription for birth control, or go out to buy a pack of condoms, or go out and get educated on population growth itself. Whatever it is, it requires an extra effort on a person’s part to contribute to the slowing down of population growth. The fact of the matter is that usually, people aren’t inclined to solving problems that aren’t “in your face” problems. While population isn’t an in your face problem right now, it will be one day, and that day is getting closer and closer. Population growth isn’t a concern that you can’t necessarily point a finger at, but that doesn’t mean the generations of today should leave a downward-spiraling problem for the generations of tomorrow.
Data Collection/Analysis
            In order to validate the claim I made earlier in this essay, I created an administered a survey open to people (that I know) of all ages. Some of the results help to give me insight on this topic to help me formulate a better theory in the future. The survey consisted of ten questions, some of which were yes or no questions, and some of which were open-ended. The survey required survey-takers to (more or less) identify themselves in order for me to get a better feel of who was taking the survey.
            The first few questions were general questions such as are you male or female, what age range are you in, what your ethnicity is, and what level of education have you achieved. So far, about 80% of the survey takers were female and 80% of the survey takers were in the 18-20 years old age range. That is not to say that all the females who took part in this survey are 18-20 years old; it simply indicates that 80% of all survey takers were in that age range. About 63% of the people taking the survey were currently enrolled in college, and 26% were high school degree or below. About 9% of survey takers had degrees. Approximately 85% of the people who partook in the survey were white and only about 4% were black and another 4% Asian.
            The next several questions were more personal, with a couple of them geared specifically towards women. One of the survey questions that was geared towards the female population asked whether or not they were on birth control. Of the 38 women who took the survey, 26 of them were on birth control. Of the 26 women who were on birth control, 16 of them believed that two people should be married before having kids. My theoretical claim was that people who are aware of population growth are directly or indirectly doing something to slow it down. Getting married before having kids requires a level of family planning, which is indirectly going to slow down the rate of population growth, thereby supporting my theoretical claim. Of the 26 women who were on birth control, 7 of them answered “other” to the question inquiring about whether or not people should be married before having kids. Some of the women who answered other elaborated on their response, most of them adding that it was “preferable, but not necessary.” Some women added that as long as they were aware of the responsibilities that come with having a child or were in a stable relationship, marriage was not necessary.
Notably, of the 38 women who took the survey, 12 were not currently on any birth control medication. Of the dozen, half believed that people should be married before having kids. At first, this was surprising because it seems the norm that if a woman is waiting to be married to have kids, she would be taking contraceptives. What my survey did not inquire about that could have potentially made this statistic more clear was whether or not the 12 women who were on birth control were sexually active. If they aren’t, then it seems obvious that there would be no need for them to be on birth control (unless it was for other reasons such as cramps or regulating her period).
Another one of the questions in the survey asked survey takers to answer the question of whether or not population growth was real. Of the 44 people who partook in the survey, 36 of them believed that population growth was real. The subsequent question then asked for a potential solution to population growth. The majority of the people who responded “yes” believed that education was a potential solution. Overall, this supports my theoretical claim that education does play a fairly large role in population growth. Other answers to the ‘potential solutions’ question include having children at an older age which would require family planning (family planning does not necessarily mean two parents, a family can be a single parent and a kid), required birth control for teenagers, cheaper and better access to birth control, incentives for less births, or limiting births outright. Two of the survey takers believed there was no concrete solution to the matter.

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

TAKE MY SURVEY

http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/MLC32WM

just say thanks

I don't understand why people don't AUTOMATICALLY say thank you when someone holds the door for them. Honestly, it only takes a breath and it goes a long way. You aren't entitled to have the door opened for you; whoever opened the door for you did an act of kindness. Show the world that you're not so self-centered that you can't give someone a little thanks for opening the door for you. Geez.

Thursday, April 12, 2012

April 12 post

In my survey, which consisted of mainly freshman, I found out that while most people don't have a strong relationship with someone who is homosexual (i.e. a family member or a friend), there are still quite a few people who do. Almost all the people who do have gay family members or friends claimed they would vote against the (discriminatory) Amendment One.


Questions
What year are you
Fr 15
So 1
Jr 0
Sr 0
What is your GPA
1 and lower 0
1.0-2.0 1
2.0-3.0 4
3.0 and higher 11
Male or Female
Male 10
Female 6
Lower, Middle or Upper class?
Lower 2
Middle 9
Upper 5
Would you say you are more…
Conservative 9
Liberal 7
Age
17 1
18 7
19 6
20 2
21 0
Do you have homosexual family members?
Yes 6
No 10
Do you have homosexual friendS?
Yes 4
No 12
Which way will you vote for Amendment I?
Support 4
Against 8
Abstain 4

Monday, April 2, 2012

Response to Ecojustice Education

I believe that in the past decade, our education system has been improving. Being from the Chapel Hill Carrboro City Schools District, which I would constitute as elite in education, I firmly believe that the education system is starting to produce higher quality students. From SAT scores to AP exam scores, the education particularly in Chapel Hill and Carrboro has been increasingly more and more competitive. In this writing, it mentions that we need to start educating people to better human life, not just prepare people for jobs and the workforce. Furthermore, in the writing it mentions that there are pretty much two ways of educating people. Pretty much, there is the old school way which is compared to "farms" or agrarianism and the new school way which would be compared to "factories" or industrialism. What I believe this essay is outlining is that while both pretty much are based from deeply held values, there are, in fact, differences to these two subjects. "The difference has to do with the values associated with the traditions and what those values have meant in political, economic, and educational arenas."

One of the other big points of this article is that the American public has lost sight of noble values including frugality, good neighborship, the avoidance of risk, and the psychological profit in work done well. I agree with three of four of these topics. I agree that the average american is pretty wasteful whether it's trash, water,  water or time. I also agree that the american public has lost sight of "good neighborship." We are no longer a society that is based off of deeply held values and instead we are one that will use others for our own benefit. The third concept that was listed in this writing was that americans are no longer avoiding risks. While it is true that people should stop being careless, in my opinion people should not stop taking risks. People take risks every day and the world is a better place because of it. The fourth topic is the psychological profit in work done well. I think that there is a lot of value in doing something with a purpose and doing it well. However, as a full-time student, I understand that it is nearly impossible to put forth your best effort with everything. Which is why people need to prioritize. Prioritizing, in my opinion, is a skill that many people lack. It is important to be able to determine what you need to do and when and in what order.

Monday, March 26, 2012

peer reviewed article

on homophobia

http://jfi.sagepub.com/content/25/7/881.full.pdf+html

Response to Indigenous Resistance

In my opinion, I think it was really presumptuous and unjustified for countries to try to get rid of indigenous roots. I believe that it has been extremely costly for cultural and historical purposes because now we know very little about those cultures and there's no way to bring them back. Using schools as a mechanism to weed out the indigenous culture is extremely manipulative. No one should be using children as leverage in any way. Trying to civilize indigenous populations was unjustified. Who is America and who is Britain to say that they can't do what they want to do and live the life they want to live. I know that sounds clicheed, but we wouldn't want some country to completely change our lifestyle and negate everything we've learned growing up. There was no reason for America and Britain to do that to the Aboriginal people in their regions.